netdev - RE: [PATCH] ixgbe: Introduce new 10GbE driver for Intel 82598 based PCI Express adapters...

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <E35F4F4D7F6C9E4E826FEC1F86CEF58304209337@orsmsx412.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date:	Mon, 9 Jul 2007 07:21:24 -0700
From:	"Veeraiyan, Ayyappan" <ayyappan.veeraiyan@...el.com>
To:	"Neil Horman" <nhorman@...driver.com>
Cc:	"Jeff Garzik" <jeff@...zik.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Kok, Auke-jan H" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>,
	<arjan@...ux.intel.com>, <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] ixgbe: Introduce new 10GbE driver for Intel 82598 based PCI	Express adapters...

>From: Neil Horman [mailto:nhorman@...driver.com]
>Replying to myself...
>	I've looked through the driver pretty throughly with regards to
my
>above
>concern, and it appears the driver is reasonably free of netpoll issues
at
>the
>moment, at least as far as what we found in e1000 was concerned.  I do

Thanks for reviewing the code..

>however,
>see a concern in the use of the in_netpoll flag within the driver.
Given
>that
>the primary registered net_device, and all the dummy net_devices in the
>rx_ring
>point to the same ixgbe_adapter structure, there can be some level of
>confusion
>over weather a given rx queue is in netpoll_mode or not.

The revised driver I am going to post today will not have fake
netdevs...

>adapter prforms a netpoll, all the individual rx queues will follow the
>in_netpoll path in the receive path (assuming misx interrupts are
used).
>The
>result I think is the potential for a large amount of packet reordering
>during a
>netpoll operation.  Perhaps not a serious problem, but likely worth
looking

Multiple Rx queues are used in non-NAPI mode only, and all Rx queues use
one netdev (which is associated with the adapter struct). Also, the RSS
(receive side scaling or rx packet steering) feature is used in multiple
rx queues mode. In this mode, HW will always select the same Rx queue
(for a flow) and this should prevent any packet reordering issue.


>Neil

Ayyappan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html