lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 14:57:16 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org> To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, IDE/ATA development list <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Deepak Saxena <dsaxena@...xity.net>, Dan Faerch <dan@...ker.dk>, Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org> Subject: Re: ata and netdev (was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23) Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 13:42:16 -0400 > Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org> wrote: > >> (just to provide my indicator of status) > > Thanks. > >>> libata-add-irq_flags-to-struct-pata_platform_info-fix.patch >> are other pata_platform people happy with this? I don't know embedded >> well enough to know if adding this struct member will break things. > > This is just a silly remove-unneeded-cast-of-void* cleanup. I wrote this > as a fixup against > libata-add-irq_flags-to-struct-pata_platform_info.patch with the intention > of folding it into that base patch, but you went and merged the submitter's > original patch so this trivial fixup got stranded in -mm. Feel free to give > it the piss-off-too-trivial treatment. I'm sorry, I didn't look closely enough. I was referring to the add-irq-flags patch itself, not your small fix. >>> ata-ahci-alpm-store-interrupt-value.patch >>> ata-ahci-alpm-expose-power-management-policy-option-to-users.patch >>> ata-ahci-alpm-enable-link-power-management-for-ata-drivers.patch >>> ata-ahci-alpm-enable-aggressive-link-power-management-for-ahci-controllers.patch >>> >>> These appear to need some work. >> seemed mostly OK to me. what comments did I miss? > > Oh, I thought these were the patches which affected scsi and which James > had issues with. I guess I got confused. hrm. ISTR James wanted some cleanups, Kristen did some cleanups, then looking at the cleanups decided they were needed / appropriate at this time. Anyway, these are in my mbox queue and the libata portions (of which the code is the majority) seem OK. Need to give them a final review. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists