[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070711013353.GA6082@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 09:33:53 +0800
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Subject: [NET]: Update comments for skb checksums
Hi Dave:
[NET]: Update comments for skb checksums
Rusty (whose comments we should all study and emulate :) pointed
out that our comments for skb checksums are no longer up-to-date.
So here is a patch to
1) add the case of partial checksums on input;
2) update partial checksum case to mention csum_start/csum_offset;
3) mention the new IPv6 feature bit.
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
diff --git a/include/linux/skbuff.h b/include/linux/skbuff.h
--- a/include/linux/skbuff.h
+++ b/include/linux/skbuff.h
@@ -65,13 +65,20 @@
* is able to produce some skb->csum, it MUST use COMPLETE,
* not UNNECESSARY.
*
+ * PARTIAL: identical to the case for output below. This may occur
+ * on a packet received directly from another Linux OS, e.g.,
+ * a virtualised Linux kernel on the same host. The packet can
+ * be treated in the same way as UNNECESSARY except that on
+ * output (i.e., forwarding) the checksum must be filled in
+ * by the OS or the hardware.
+ *
* B. Checksumming on output.
*
* NONE: skb is checksummed by protocol or csum is not required.
*
* PARTIAL: device is required to csum packet as seen by hard_start_xmit
- * from skb->transport_header to the end and to record the checksum
- * at skb->transport_header + skb->csum.
+ * from skb->csum_start to the end and to record the checksum
+ * at skb->csum_start + skb->csum_offset.
*
* Device must show its capabilities in dev->features, set
* at device setup time.
@@ -82,6 +89,7 @@
* TCP/UDP over IPv4. Sigh. Vendors like this
* way by an unknown reason. Though, see comment above
* about CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY. 8)
+ * NETIF_F_IPV6_CSUM about as dumb as the last one but does IPv6 instead.
*
* Any questions? No questions, good. --ANK
*/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists