[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6278d2220707130153h63549c2ck203b372931c0eae5@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 09:53:04 +0100
From: "Daniel J Blueman" <daniel.blueman@...il.com>
To: "Stephen Hemminger" <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Linux Netdev" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: sky2 hangs without any messages
On 12/07/07, Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 22:29:50 +0100
> "Daniel J Blueman" <daniel.blueman@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > On 12/07/07, Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > > On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 23:55:29 +0100
> > > "Daniel J Blueman" <daniel.blueman@...il.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Please try again with post 2.6.22 git version (1.16)?
> > > > >
> > > > > Reproduced with 2.6.22 w/ sky2 1.16 from git. We observe this
> > > > > characteristic failure on the NFS server (always around 2-3GB of
> > > > > transmit):
> > > > >
> > > > > $ ifconfig lan0
> > > > > lan0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:03:2D:05:9C:27
> > > > > inet addr:192.168.0.250 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
> > > > > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> > > > > RX packets:24007220 errors:1 dropped:1 overruns:0 frame:1
> > > > > TX packets:13886495 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> > > > > collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
> > > > > RX bytes:171026170 (163.1 MiB) TX bytes:2262910580 (2.1 GiB)
> > > > > Interrupt:16
> > > > >
> > > > > I'll rebuild with debugfs and grab the debug you've exported.
> > > >
> > > > In quiescent state [1] and in failure state [2]. This time, 2 framing
> > > > failures [3]; took 3.6GB of transmit to hit the window.
> > >
> > > Since the IRQ workaround has a timeout of 100ms. I observed cases where
> > > the TCP connection dropped (because of lost packets), but the network device
> > > then recovered. Can you ping the other side after it hangs? Or reconnect?
> > >
> > > Ifconfig lumps a bunch of different errors together so it can confuse the issue.
> > > Preference is for:
> > > ip -s -s link show eth0
> > > or
> > > grep -v '^0' /sys/class/net/eth0/statistics/*
> > >
> > > If the framing error does reproduce with the hang, perhaps the chip needs some
> > > receive flush logic to recover. Receive errors normally put a message in syslog
> > > output, did you look there?
> > >
> > > > Daniel
> > > >
> > > > --- [1]
> > > >
> > > > # cat sky2/lan0
> > > > IRQ src=0 mask=c000001d control=0
> > > > Status ring (empty)
> > > > Tx ring pending=191...191 report=191 done=191
> > > >
> > > > Rx ring hw get=956 put=61 last=1023
> > > >
> > > > --- [2]
> > > >
> > > > # cat sky2/lan0
> > > > IRQ src=0 mask=c000001d control=0
> > > > Status ring (empty)
> > > > Tx ring pending=251...251 report=251 done=251
> > > >
> > > > Rx ring hw get=1020 put=160 last=1023
> > > >
> > > > --- [3]
> > > >
> > > > $ ifconfig lan0
> > > > lan0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:03:2D:05:9C:27
> > > > inet addr:192.168.0.250 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
> > > > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> > > > RX packets:13304841 errors:1 dropped:1 overruns:0 frame:2
> > > > TX packets:7493765 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> > > > collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
> > > > RX bytes:232720755 (221.9 MiB) TX bytes:3964088142 (3.6 GiB)
> > > > Interrupt:16
> > >
> > > You aren't hung because of lost IRQ. When than happens the debugfs output will have
> > > a bunch of Tx packets stuck (not cleaned up), and Status messages, and receive packets.
> >
> > I'll grab the above info when I next get chance.
> >
> > The vendor driver recovery process may be worthwhile taking a look at;
> > I guess you've seen the code near the bottom of skge.c (under 'case
> > SK_DRV_RECOVER')? The driver kicks the chip with
> > SK_PNMI_EVT_XMAC_RESET and calls SkYuk2RestartRxBmu - perhaps
> > something like this sequence is needed for a more targetted approach?
>
> That code triggers (falsely) on an idle or barely active link. It won't work.
> It is covering over a bunch of problems in the vendor driver that like improper
> flow control.
Yes. Although my point was about how it resets the relevant parts of
the chip; the OS just sees a netif_stop_queue and a netif_wake_queue,
rather than marking the interface down etc.
Daniel
--
Daniel J Blueman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists