[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <39e6f6c70707161824q6dbee063y15d0a12563fa813c@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 22:24:44 -0300
From: "Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" <acme@...stprotocols.net>
To: "Francois Romieu" <romieu@...zoreil.com>
Cc: Mika.Lansirinne@...nesoft.com, "Jeff Garzik" <jeff@...zik.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] 8139cp: implement the missing dev->tx_timeout
On 7/13/07, Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Mika Lansirinne <mika.lansirinne@...nesoft.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/8139cp.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/8139cp.c b/drivers/net/8139cp.c
> index 807e699..e970e64 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/8139cp.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/8139cp.c
> @@ -26,7 +26,6 @@
>
> TODO:
> * Test Tx checksumming thoroughly
> - * Implement dev->tx_timeout
>
> Low priority TODO:
> * Complete reset on PciErr
> @@ -1218,6 +1217,30 @@ static int cp_close (struct net_device *dev)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static void cp_tx_timeout(struct net_device *dev)
> +{
> + struct cp_private *cp = netdev_priv(dev);
> + unsigned long flags;
> + int rc;
What is the point of this variable...
> +
> + printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: Transmit timeout, status %2x %4x %4x %4x\n",
> + dev->name, cpr8(Cmd), cpr16(CpCmd),
> + cpr16(IntrStatus), cpr16(IntrMask));
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&cp->lock, flags);
> +
> + cp_stop_hw(cp);
> + cp_clean_rings(cp);
> + rc = cp_init_rings(cp);
... if it is set and ...
> + cp_start_hw(cp);
> +
> + netif_wake_queue(dev);
> +
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cp->lock, flags);
> +
> + return;
> +}
... never used?
- Arnaldo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists