lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 08:58:41 +0530 From: Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams@...oid.org> To: netdev@...r.kernel.org Cc: shemminger@...l.org Subject: tc filter add ... fw ... action drop Hi. Is it a bug that: # tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1: protocol ip prio 0 handle 0xfffffff fw police rate 1 burst 1 mpu 0 mtu 1 action drop ^^^^^^^^^^^ creates a filter that looks like: # tc filter ls dev eth0 filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 49152 fw filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 49152 fw handle 0xfffffff police 0x1 rate 0bit burst 0b mtu 1b action reclassify ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ref -543190236 bind 4 (which reclassifies and thus lets 0xfffffff-marked packets through). I'm pretty sure this used to work under 2.4.x (though I no longer have a 2.4 box to test with), but it hasn't worked on any of the 2.6.x kernels I've tried (with both iproute2-ss060323 and 070710). I haven't been able to find anything that suggests this change is intentional. If it's not immediately obvious to anyone what the problem is, I could try to track it down. -- ams - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists