[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070718.021814.99458359.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 02:18:14 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: acme@...stprotocols.net
Cc: joakim.koskela@...t.fi, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-2.6.22-rc7] xfrm beet interfamily support
From: "Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" <acme@...stprotocols.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 09:56:59 -0300
> Sorry for not commented that the code you were using (and David said
> it was invalid) is in fact valid:
>
> skb->transport_header = skb->network_header;
>
> This works for both offsets and pointers, i.e. both transport_header
> and network_header are in the same "address space".
>
>
> skb_set_transport_header(skb, skb_network_offset(skb));
>
> Also works, but its too convoluted IMHO, for pointers it would reduce to:
>
> skb->transport_header = skb->data + skb->network_header
> - skb->data;
>
> for offsets:
>
> skb->transport_header = skb->data - skb->head;
> skb->transport_header += skb->head + skb->network_header
> - skb->data;
>
> I.e. both reduce to:
>
> skb->transport_header = skb->network_header;
>
> Some more comments below, but I think this time, sans the above
> possible cleanup, your patch is OK wrt offsets/pointers.
Thanks for the correction, indeed you are correct :)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists