[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070721.205425.61337743.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 20:54:25 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: rusty@...tcorp.com.au
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, shemminger@...ux-foundation.org,
jgarzik@...ox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: Resurrect napi_poll patch.
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 12:39:32 +1000
> But if netdev -> driver_private can be optimized, so can driver_private
> -> netdev. We just don't have a wrapper for it. netdev_of() perhaps?
>
> (If it can't be implemented by ptr arith, we have to do some allocation
> tricks to hide the dev ptr before driver_private, but it's still
> implementable).
>
> Perhaps we should do this anyway: it's another "every driver wants it"
> kind of deal AFAICT...
Color me convinced :-)
Ok, I'll put the napi_struct info the driver private and respin
the patch.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists