[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1185212957.15699.322.camel@faith.austin.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 12:49:17 -0500
From: Joy Latten <latten@...tin.ibm.com>
To: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
linux-audit@...hat.com, sgrubb@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] make xfrm_audit_log more generic
On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 21:45 -0400, James Morris wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Jul 2007, Joy Latten wrote:
>
> > --- linux-2.6.22/include/linux/audit.h 2007-07-19 13:17:22.000000000 -0500
> > +++ linux-2.6.22.patch/include/linux/audit.h 2007-07-19 13:21:29.000000000 -0500
> > @@ -108,10 +108,7 @@
> > #define AUDIT_MAC_CIPSOV4_DEL 1408 /* NetLabel: del CIPSOv4 DOI entry */
> > #define AUDIT_MAC_MAP_ADD 1409 /* NetLabel: add LSM domain mapping */
> > #define AUDIT_MAC_MAP_DEL 1410 /* NetLabel: del LSM domain mapping */
> > -#define AUDIT_MAC_IPSEC_ADDSA 1411 /* Add a XFRM state */
> > -#define AUDIT_MAC_IPSEC_DELSA 1412 /* Delete a XFRM state */
> > -#define AUDIT_MAC_IPSEC_ADDSPD 1413 /* Add a XFRM policy */
> > -#define AUDIT_MAC_IPSEC_DELSPD 1414 /* Delete a XFRM policy */
> > +#define AUDIT_MAC_IPSEC_EVENT 1411 /* Audit IPSec events */
>
> Will this cause existing applications to break?
>
Perhaps someone in audit list could help answer this.
During testing, because I changed the above defines, all
IPSec events are listed as "MAC_IPSEC_ADDSA" for now without
userspace change. Is this ok? Or is there a better way to
migrate this change in? Perhaps leave previous IPsec defines
and just add in a new one and use it? If that is better
approach, let me know and I will change code to accomodate.
Regards,
Joy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists