[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <OFFAB073E4.487DACF3-ON65257321.00101BE3-65257321.00104971@in.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 08:27:53 +0530
From: Krishna Kumar2 <krkumar2@...ibm.com>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, gaagaan@...il.com,
general@...ts.openfabrics.org, hadi@...erus.ca,
herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, jagana@...ibm.com, jeff@...zik.org,
johnpol@....mipt.ru, kumarkr@...ux.ibm.com, mcarlson@...adcom.com,
mchan@...adcom.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com, rdreier@...co.com,
rick.jones2@...com, Robert.Olsson@...a.slu.se, sri@...ibm.com,
tgraf@...g.ch, xma@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/12 -Rev2] Changes to netdevice.h
Hi Patrick,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net> wrote on 07/22/2007 10:36:51 PM:
> Krishna Kumar wrote:
> > @@ -472,6 +474,9 @@ struct net_device
> > void *priv; /* pointer to private data */
> > int (*hard_start_xmit) (struct sk_buff *skb,
> > struct net_device *dev);
> > + int (*hard_start_xmit_batch) (struct net_device
> > + *dev);
> > +
>
>
> Os this function really needed? Can't you just call hard_start_xmit with
> a NULL skb and have the driver use dev->blist?
Probably not. I will see how to do it this way and get back to you.
> > /* These may be needed for future network-power-down code. */
> > unsigned long trans_start; /* Time (in jiffies) of last Tx
*/
> >
> > @@ -582,6 +587,8 @@ struct net_device
> > #define NETDEV_ALIGN 32
> > #define NETDEV_ALIGN_CONST (NETDEV_ALIGN - 1)
> >
> > +#define BATCHING_ON(dev) ((dev->features & NETIF_F_BATCH_ON) != 0)
> > +
> > static inline void *netdev_priv(const struct net_device *dev)
> > {
> > return dev->priv;
> > @@ -832,6 +839,8 @@ extern int dev_set_mac_address(struct n
> > struct sockaddr *);
> > extern int dev_hard_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb,
> > struct net_device *dev);
> > +extern int dev_add_skb_to_blist(struct sk_buff *skb,
> > + struct net_device *dev);
>
>
> Again, function signatures should be introduced in the same patch
> that contains the function. Splitting by file doesn't make sense.
Right. I did it for some but missed this. Sorry, will redo.
thanks,
- KK
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists