[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46A6021B.4070606@trash.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 15:43:55 +0200
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To: Varun Chandramohan <varunc@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
sri@...ibm.com, dlstevens@...ibm.com, varuncha@...ibm.com,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] Add new timeval_to_sec function
Varun Chandramohan wrote:
> Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
>
>>>>I don't think you should round down timeout values.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>Can you elaborate on that? As per the RFC of MIB ,we need only seconds
>>>granularity. Taking that as the case i dont understand why round down
>>>should not be done?
>>>
>>>
>>
>>When you like to create any timeout based on your calculated value, you
>>might run into the problem that your calculated value is set to _zero_
>>even if there was "some time" before the conversion. This might probably
>>not what you indented to get.
>>
>>So what about rounding up with
>>
>>return (tv->tv_sec + (tv->tv_usec + 999999)/1000000);
>>
>>???
>>
>>
>
> This can done. Is this what you were ref to me, Patrick?
Yes, timeouts should usually be at least as long as specified.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists