[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46A57CF3.6040505@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 09:45:47 +0530
From: Varun Chandramohan <varunc@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, sri@...ibm.com, dlstevens@...ibm.com,
varuncha@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] Add new timeval_to_sec function
Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Varun Chandramohan wrote:
>
>> /**
>> + * timeval_to_sec - Convert timeval to seconds
>> + * @tv: pointer to the timeval variable to be converted
>> + *
>> + * Returns the seconds representation of timeval parameter.
>> + */
>> +static inline time_t timeval_to_sec(const struct timeval *tv)
>> +{
>> + return (tv->tv_sec + (tv->tv_usec + 500000)/1000000);
>> +}
>>
>
>
> I don't think you should round down timeout values.
>
Can you elaborate on that? As per the RFC of MIB ,we need only seconds
granularity. Taking that as the case i dont understand why round down
should not be done?
Regards,
Varun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists