netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/1] netxen: Load firmware during probe, dma watchdog fix.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <46A75E4B.4050504@garzik.org>
Date:	Wed, 25 Jul 2007 10:29:31 -0400
From:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To:	Dhananjay Phadke <dhananjay@...xen.com>
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, rob@...xen.com,
	Wen Xiong <wenxiong@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] netxen: Load firmware during probe, dma watchdog
 fix.

Dhananjay Phadke wrote:
> Jeff,
> 
> You committed old patch, which I had asked to ignore for two newer patches.
> 
> [PATCH 1/1] netxen: Load firmware during probe, dma watchdog fix.
> 
> is wrong patch that went in, instead please commit:
> 
> [PATCH 1/2] netxen: IMEZ multiport card 2nd port issue, dma watchdog fix
> [PATCH 2/2] netxen: Fix interrupt handling for multiport adapters

Two responses:

1) I never received the two patches you mention.  It helps (though not 
required) to CC me, in addition to sending patches to netdev.

2) Kernel history is fixed in stone, once committed upstream.  Thus, you 
must regenerate your patches based on the fact that old-patch is now 
upstream.

	Jeff



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html