netdev - Re: [RFC] fib_trie: whitespace cleanup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 30 Jul 2007 10:07:34 -0700
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>,
	Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@...a.slu.se>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Josh Triplett <josh@...nel.org>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] fib_trie: whitespace cleanup

On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 09:56:30PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 08:44:21 -0700 "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 11:49:42AM +0100, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > > Whitespace cleanup run code through lindent then cleanup results.
> > > Applys after other two patches.
> > > 
> > > --- a/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c	2007-07-26 10:17:21.000000000 +0100
> > > +++ b/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c	2007-07-26 11:47:52.000000000 +0100
> > > @@ -156,7 +156,8 @@ struct trie {
> > >  };
> > > 
> > >  static void put_child(struct trie *t, struct tnode *tn, int i, struct node *n);
> > > -static void tnode_put_child_reorg(struct tnode *tn, int i, struct node *n, int wasfull);
> > > +static void tnode_put_child_reorg(struct tnode *tn, int i, struct node *n,
> > > +				  int wasfull);
> > >  static struct node *resize(struct trie *t, struct tnode *tn);
> > >  static struct tnode *inflate(struct trie *t, struct tnode *tn);
> > >  static struct tnode *halve(struct trie *t, struct tnode *tn);
> > > @@ -167,13 +168,12 @@ static struct trie *trie_local = NULL, *
> > > 
> > >  static inline struct tnode *node_parent(struct node *node)
> > >  {
> > > -	return rcu_dereference((struct tnode *) (node->parent & ~NODE_TYPE_MASK));
> > > +	return rcu_dereference((struct tnode *)(node->parent & ~NODE_TYPE_MASK));
> > 
> > The potential issue is applying rcu_dereference() to an rvalue
> > as opposed to an lvalue.  So how about the following?
> > 
> 
> I did this:
> 
> static inline struct tnode *node_parent(struct node *node)
> {
> 	struct tnode *ret;
> 
> 	ret = (struct tnode *)(node->parent & ~NODE_TYPE_MASK);
> 	return rcu_dereference(ret);
> }

I would feel more comfortable with the rcu_dereference() covering the
initial fetch from node->parent, but do not have any hard objections
to your approach.

						Thanx, Paul
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html