[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070730191232.GC16182@rainbow>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 13:12:32 -0600
From: Valerie Henson <val@....edu>
To: "Denis V. Lunev" <den@...nvz.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
tulip-users@...ts.sourceforge.net, devel@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] possible deadlock in tulip driver
(No longer maintainer, btw.)
What situation have you tested this under? Thanks,
-VAL
On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 11:49:08AM +0400, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
> Calling flush_scheduled_work() may deadlock if called under rtnl_lock
> (from dev->stop) as linkwatch_event() may be on the workqueue and it will try
> to get the rtnl_lock
>
> Signed-off-by: Denis V. Lunev <den@...nvz.org>
> ---
>
> tulip_core.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> --- ./drivers/net/tulip/tulip_core.c.tulip 2007-07-16 12:54:29.000000000 +0400
> +++ ./drivers/net/tulip/tulip_core.c 2007-07-23 19:06:24.000000000 +0400
> @@ -726,8 +726,6 @@ static void tulip_down (struct net_devic
> void __iomem *ioaddr = tp->base_addr;
> unsigned long flags;
>
> - flush_scheduled_work();
> -
> del_timer_sync (&tp->timer);
> #ifdef CONFIG_TULIP_NAPI
> del_timer_sync (&tp->oom_timer);
> @@ -1788,6 +1786,8 @@ static void __devexit tulip_remove_one (
> if (!dev)
> return;
>
> + flush_scheduled_work();
> +
> tp = netdev_priv(dev);
> unregister_netdev(dev);
> pci_free_consistent (pdev,
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists