[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070730.190350.52168394.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 19:03:50 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: rdreier@...co.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, shemminger@...ux-foundation.org,
jgarzik@...ox.com, hadi@...erus.ca, rusty@...tcorp.com.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC]: napi_struct V4
From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 19:01:55 -0700
> Are you saying that netif_rx_reschedule() itself is racy?
Nevermind, you're right.
I'll see if I can resurrect something akin to netif_rx_reschedule()
when I get back to the NAPI patches. Probably what I'll do is let
the ->poll() handler make sure to accumulate 'rx' work counts if
it loops again on netif_rx_reschedule() instead of dorking with
the quota and budget in that helper function.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists