[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46AEBADB.7030007@candelatech.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 21:30:19 -0700
From: Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: hadi@...erus.ca, kaber@...sh.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
mcarlson@...adcom.com
Subject: Re: RFC: on [ab]use of skb->cb by VLAN code
David Miller wrote:
> From: jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>
> Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 22:02:04 -0400
>
>
>> I came across the issue because i used cb in batching to store transient
>> state which is used between qdisc dequeueing and hardware enqueueing
>> (looked and smelled legit to me).
>>
>
> Right, dequeue->device should be OK and doesn't work because of
> the VLAN issue.
>
So, shall we add a new field to the skb in order to get the info out of cb?
Looks like a single 32-bit field would be sufficient.
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists