[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070731.021602.48807945.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 02:16:02 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: florz@...rz.de
Cc: mostrows@...thlink.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND][PATCH 1/3] PPPoE: improved hashing routine
From: Florian Zumbiehl <florz@...rz.de>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 11:01:59 +0200
> Assuming that it was supposed to read s/head/hash/: Same disclaimers
> apply, but I'd say this considers only addr&0xff0fff0f000f and
> sid&0x0fff, so, well, yes, it's better, but still not quite what I
> think it should be ;-)
Indeed it's still bogus.
> > Actually it might be simpler and more efficient to just make
> > PPPOE_HASH_SHIFT be 8.
>
> SHIFT? SIZE? BITS?
You know what I meant :-)
PPPOE_HASH_BITS.
I guess otherwise we degenerate back to your original patch :)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists