[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200708091730.19024.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 17:30:16 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Chris Snook <csnook@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, ak@...e.de, heiko.carstens@...ibm.com,
davem@...emloft.net, schwidefsky@...ibm.com, wensong@...ux-vs.org,
horms@...ge.net.au, wjiang@...ilience.com, cfriesen@...tel.com,
zlynx@....org, rpjday@...dspring.com, jesper.juhl@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
On Thursday 09 August 2007, Chris Snook wrote:
> a) chicken and egg: asm-generic/atomic.h depends on definitions in asm/atomic.h
Ok, I see.
> If you can find a way to reshuffle the code and make it simpler, I personally am
> all for it. I'm skeptical that you'll get much to show for the effort.
I guess it could be done using more macros or new headers, but I don't see
a way that would actually improve the situation.
> b) The definitions aren't precisely identical between all architectures, so it
> would be a mess of special cases, which gets us right back to where we are now.
Why are they not identical? Anything beyond the 32/64 bit difference should
be the same afaics, or it might cause more bugs.
Arnd <><
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists