lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46BB7DD0.1000509@intel.com>
Date:	Thu, 09 Aug 2007 13:49:20 -0700
From:	"Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>
To:	Brandon Philips <bphilips@...e.de>
CC:	Ramkrishna Vepa <Ramkrishna.Vepa@...erion.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, teheo@...e.de,
	e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [patch 1/5][RFC] NET: Change pci_enable_device	topci_reenable_device
 to keep device enable balance

Brandon Philips wrote:
> On 17:30 Wed 08 Aug 2007, Ramkrishna Vepa wrote:
>> Before slot_reset event is called io_error_detected could be called
>> (where pci_disable_device() is called), right? 
> 
> Oops!  Right, the documentation says .error_detected is _always_ called
> before .slot_reset.  So, this patch is not correct.  Please don't merge
> this.
> 
> From Documentation/pci-error-recovery.txt:
> 
> STEP 1: Notification
> --------------------
> Platform calls the error_detected() callback on every instance of
> every driver affected by the error.
> ...
> 
> If any driver requested a slot reset (by returning PCI_ERS_RESULT_NEED_RESET),
> then recovery proceeds to STEP 4 (Slot Reset).
> 
>> The pci_reenable_device() will call enable only if the device was
>> enabled before and would not be enabled if the device were disabled. Is
>> this the intended behavior?
> 
> Yes, you are right.  And no it isn't.


it would be great if you can convince Linas Vepstas to review and ack your patch 
- he's the one who knows the error handling code the best.

Auke
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ