[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46BB7DD0.1000509@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2007 13:49:20 -0700
From: "Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>
To: Brandon Philips <bphilips@...e.de>
CC: Ramkrishna Vepa <Ramkrishna.Vepa@...erion.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, teheo@...e.de,
e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [patch 1/5][RFC] NET: Change pci_enable_device topci_reenable_device
to keep device enable balance
Brandon Philips wrote:
> On 17:30 Wed 08 Aug 2007, Ramkrishna Vepa wrote:
>> Before slot_reset event is called io_error_detected could be called
>> (where pci_disable_device() is called), right?
>
> Oops! Right, the documentation says .error_detected is _always_ called
> before .slot_reset. So, this patch is not correct. Please don't merge
> this.
>
> From Documentation/pci-error-recovery.txt:
>
> STEP 1: Notification
> --------------------
> Platform calls the error_detected() callback on every instance of
> every driver affected by the error.
> ...
>
> If any driver requested a slot reset (by returning PCI_ERS_RESULT_NEED_RESET),
> then recovery proceeds to STEP 4 (Slot Reset).
>
>> The pci_reenable_device() will call enable only if the device was
>> enabled before and would not be enabled if the device were disabled. Is
>> this the intended behavior?
>
> Yes, you are right. And no it isn't.
it would be great if you can convince Linas Vepstas to review and ack your patch
- he's the one who knows the error handling code the best.
Auke
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists