[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <617E1C2C70743745A92448908E030B2A0224C94A@scsmsx411.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 16:32:42 -0700
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"Chris Snook" <csnook@...hat.com>
Cc: "Andreas Schwab" <schwab@...e.de>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>, <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
<ak@...e.de>, <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
<schwidefsky@...ibm.com>, <wensong@...ux-vs.org>,
<horms@...ge.net.au>, <wjiang@...ilience.com>,
<cfriesen@...tel.com>, <zlynx@....org>, <rpjday@...dspring.com>,
<jesper.juhl@...il.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 9/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently on ia64
> Here are the functions in which they occur in the object file. You
> may have to chase down some inlining to find the function that
> actually uses atomic_*().
Ignore this ... Andreas' patch was only two lines so I
thought I'd "save time" by just hand-editing the source over
on my build machine. I managed to goof that by editing the
wrong function for one of the cases. :-(
New result. With Andreas's patch correctly applied, the generated
vmlinux is identical with/without your patch.
-Tony
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists