netdev - Re: [patch (testing)] Re: 2.6.20->2.6.21 - networking dies after random time

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070810113747.GB3757@ff.dom.local>
Date:	Fri, 10 Aug 2007 13:37:47 +0200
From:	Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...pl>
To:	Marcin Ślusarz <marcin.slusarz@...il.com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Jean-Baptiste Vignaud <vignaud@...dmail.fr>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	shemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-net <linux-net@...r.kernel.org>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [patch (testing)] Re: 2.6.20->2.6.21 - networking dies after random time

On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 12:43:43PM +0200, Marcin Ślusarz wrote:
> 2007/8/10, Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...pl>:
> > (..)
> > I think, there is this one possible for your testing yet?:
> > Subject: [patch] genirq: temporary fix for level-triggered IRQ resend
> > Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 13:00:37 +0200
> I think I already tested this patch, but this thread is sooo big and I
> can't find my response...

I think it was very similar Ingo's patch, which after your testing
is in 2.6.23-rc2 now. I've moved return for level type irqs a little
later, and it works a new way only for "x86_64".

But, I think, now this patch is less important: if you find some time,
try mostly new Ingo's or Thomas' patches (latest possible versions).

> 
> > If it's not a great problem it would be interesting to try this with
> > different CONFIG_HZ too e.g. you could start with 100 (I guess, you
> > tested very similar thing in 2.6.23-rc2 with 1000(?) already).
> My all tests were done on 2.6.22.1

Fine! If it's not said otherwise this version should be appropriate for
most of these patches. But, please, send your current configs on next
posibility (dmesg, /proc/interrupts and .config).

Bye (till monday),
Jarek P.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html