netdev - Re: [PATCH] b44-ssb: Fix the SSB dependency hell

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200708111642.39348.mb@bu3sch.de>
Date:	Sat, 11 Aug 2007 16:42:39 +0200
From:	Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de>
To:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
Cc:	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
	John Linville <linville@...driver.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] b44-ssb: Fix the SSB dependency hell

On Saturday 11 August 2007 16:30:02 Adrian Bunk wrote:
> And offering more options than required or manually sending users into 
> other menus are bad thing for your users.

Breaking compilations are as bad.
So, does your example actually work in practice and not only
in theory, too? My select stuff should have worked in theory, too.
But it broke, for whatever reasons on whatever weird setups.

We somehow are in an endless loop here:

loop:
	implement it with select
	people complain select it bad and suggest to implement it with depends on
	implement it with depends on
	either
		users don't find it anymore
		users complain
	or
		it needs way to tell the user what to select first
		developers complain
	goto loop

;)

-- 
Greetings Michael.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html