netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently on alpha

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <ef7e94b08a6515d33039d187e04db5db@kernel.crashing.org>
Date:	Sat, 11 Aug 2007 02:38:40 +0200
From:	Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org>
To:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc:	paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@...ibm.com,
	horms@...ge.net.au, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	csnook@...hat.com, rpjday@...dspring.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	ak@...e.de, cfriesen@...tel.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, jesper.juhl@...il.com,
	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, zlynx@....org, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
	davem@...emloft.net, wensong@...ux-vs.org, wjiang@...ilience.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently on alpha

>> That means GCC cannot compile Linux; it already optimises
>> some accesses to scalars to smaller accesses when it knows
>> it is allowed to.  Not often though, since it hardly ever
>> helps in the cost model it employs.
>
> Please give an example code snippet + gcc version + arch
> to back this up.

	unsigned char f(unsigned long *p)
	{
	        return *p & 1;
	}

with both

	powerpc64-linux-gcc (GCC) 4.3.0 20070731 (experimental)

and

	powerpc64-linux-gcc-4.2.0 (GCC) 4.2.0

(sorry, I don't have anything newer or older right now; if you
really care, I can test with those too)

generate (in 64-bit mode):

	.L.f:
		lbz 3,7(3)
		rldicl 3,3,0,63
		blr

and in 32-bit mode:

	f:
		stwu 1,-16(1)
		nop
		nop
		lbz 3,3(3)
		addi 1,1,16
		rlwinm 3,3,0,31,31
		blr

(the nops are because I use --with-cpu=970).


But perhaps you do not care for PowerPC, in which case:

	i686-linux-gcc (GCC) 4.2.0 20060410 (experimental)

(sorry for the old version, I don't build x86 compilers
all that often; also I don't have a 64-bit version right
now):

	f:
		pushl   %ebp
		movl    %esp, %ebp
		movl    8(%ebp), %eax
		popl    %ebp
		movzbl  (%eax), %eax
		andl    $1, %eax
		ret


If you want testing with any other versions, and/or for
any other target architecture, I can do that; it takes a
few minutes to build a compiler.

It is quite hard to build a testcase that reads more than
one part of the "long", since for small testcases the
compiler will almost always be smart enough to do one
bigger read instead; but it certainly isn't inconceivable,
and anyway the compiler would be fully in its right to do
reads non-atomically if not instructed otherwise.


Segher

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html