[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070813081441.GA30089@2ka.mipt.ru>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 12:14:41 +0400
From: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>
To: Daniel Phillips <phillips@...nq.net>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: Block device throttling [Re: Distributed storage.]
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 11:44:00PM -0700, Daniel Phillips (phillips@...nq.net) wrote:
> On Sunday 12 August 2007 22:36, I wrote:
> > Note! There are two more issues I forgot to mention earlier.
>
> Oops, and there is also:
>
> 3) The bio throttle, which is supposed to prevent deadlock, can itself
> deadlock. Let me see if I can remember how it goes.
>
> * generic_make_request puts a bio in flight
> * the bio gets past the throttle and initiates network IO
> * net calls sk_alloc->alloc_pages->shrink_caches
> * shrink_caches submits a bio recursively to our block device
> * this bio blocks on the throttle
> * net may never get the memory it needs, and we are wedged
If system is in such condition, it is already broken - throttle limit
must be lowered (next time) not to allow such situation.
--
Evgeniy Polyakov
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists