[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070815234146.GB28775@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 07:41:46 +0800
From: Herbert Xu <herbert.xu@...hat.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Satyam Sharma <satyam@...radead.org>,
Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>,
Chris Snook <csnook@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
ak@...e.de, heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, davem@...emloft.net,
schwidefsky@...ibm.com, wensong@...ux-vs.org, horms@...ge.net.au,
wjiang@...ilience.com, cfriesen@...tel.com, zlynx@....org,
rpjday@...dspring.com, jesper.juhl@...il.com,
segher@...nel.crashing.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 11:45:20AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 07:19:57PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> > Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > > Let's turn this around. Can you give a single example where
> > > the volatile semantics is needed in a legitimate way?
> >
> > Accessing H/W registers? But apart from that...
>
> Communicating between process context and interrupt/NMI handlers using
> per-CPU variables.
Remeber we're talking about atomic_read/atomic_set. Please
cite the actual file/function name you have in mind.
Thanks,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists