netdev - set_multicast_list vs. set_rx

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1187181208.3998.44.camel@johannes.berg>
Date:	Wed, 15 Aug 2007 14:33:28 +0200
From:	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Subject: set_multicast_list vs. set_rx_mode

Hey,

Is it intentional that in the case where set_rx_mode is assigned, you
still need to assign set_multicast_list even if it won't ever be called
as a flag for SIOCADDMULTI?

I was thinking of converting the wireless code to use set_rx_mode and
assign set_multicast_list only if the underlying hardware supports
multicast filtering, and it seems that is well-supported, but it does
seem a bit weird that set_multicast_list degrades to a flag.

johannes

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (191 bytes)