netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/1] bonding: eliminate RTNL assertion spew

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 15 Aug 2007 14:36:27 -0400
From:	"Mike Snitzer" <snitzer@...il.com>
To:	"Andy Gospodarek" <andy@...yhouse.net>
Cc:	"Stephen Hemminger" <shemminger@...l.org>,
	"Jeff Garzik" <jeff@...zik.org>, fubar@...ibm.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] bonding: eliminate RTNL assertion spew

I'd very much like to help out.  The "rtnl assertion spew" isn't
instilling confidence in customers I've been working with.  If you'd
like to send me patches in private I'd help test them ASAP.

Could you elaborate on the associated risk of _not_ fixing these
issues?  balance-alb _seems_ to be working even though these traces
occur on initialization.  But these rtnl traces are clearly more
generic than balance-alb.

regards,
Mike

On 8/14/07, Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net> wrote:
> On 8/14/07, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...il.com> wrote:
> > Andy,
> >
> > Is there an updated version of this patch?
> >
> > Please advise, thanks.
> >
> >
>
> Mike,
>
> There is a version that Jay and I have been testing and if you would
> like to help out, we could probably send you some patches.
>
> Jay has split the entire patch into smaller chunks, and we hope to
> post the entire thing quite soon (days not months).
>
> -andy
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html