[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <D5C1322C3E673F459512FB59E0DDC329036D21B5@orsmsx414.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 01:38:02 -0700
From: "Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P" <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com>
To: "Brandon Philips" <bphilips@...e.de>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Cc: <teheo@...e.de>
Subject: RE: [patch 4/4] Update e1000 driver to use devres.
> Index: linux-2.6/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c
> +++ linux-2.6/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c
> @@ -860,15 +860,14 @@ e1000_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, {
> struct net_device *netdev;
> struct e1000_adapter *adapter;
> - unsigned long mmio_start, mmio_len;
> - unsigned long flash_start, flash_len;
> + unsigned long mmio_len, flash_len;
>
> static int cards_found = 0;
> static int global_quad_port_a = 0; /* global ksp3 port
> a indication */
> int i, err, pci_using_dac;
> uint16_t eeprom_data = 0;
> uint16_t eeprom_apme_mask = E1000_EEPROM_APME;
> - if ((err = pci_enable_device(pdev)))
> + if ((err = pcim_enable_device(pdev)))
> return err;
>
> if (!(err = pci_set_dma_mask(pdev, DMA_64BIT_MASK)) &&
> @@ -878,20 +877,19 @@ e1000_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> if ((err = pci_set_dma_mask(pdev, DMA_32BIT_MASK)) &&
> (err = pci_set_consistent_dma_mask(pdev,
> DMA_32BIT_MASK))) {
> E1000_ERR("No usable DMA configuration,
> aborting\n");
> - goto err_dma;
> + return err;
> }
> pci_using_dac = 0;
> }
>
> if ((err = pci_request_regions(pdev, e1000_driver_name)))
> - goto err_pci_reg;
> + return err;
>
> pci_set_master(pdev);
>
> - err = -ENOMEM;
> - netdev = alloc_etherdev(sizeof(struct e1000_adapter));
> + netdev = devm_alloc_etherdev(&pdev->dev, sizeof(struct
> +e1000_adapter));
> if (!netdev)
> - goto err_alloc_etherdev;
> + return -ENOMEM;
I'm a bit confused why you removed the goto's, and then removed all the
target unwinding code at the bottom of e1000_probe(). Those labels
clean up resources if something fails, like the err_sw_init label. I
don't see anything in the devres code that jumps out at me that explains
why we can do away with these cleanup routines. Thoughts?
Thanks,
-PJ Waskiewicz
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists