[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <33a54cfcfda7e50e43a7399780626869@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 00:34:34 +0200
From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Satyam Sharma <satyam@...radead.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>, heiko.carstens@...ibm.com,
horms@...ge.net.au, Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>,
Bill Fink <billfink@...dspring.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, ak@...e.de, cfriesen@...tel.com,
rpjday@...dspring.com, jesper.juhl@...il.com,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, zlynx@....org,
davids@...master.com, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
Chris Snook <csnook@...hat.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, davem@...emloft.net,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
wensong@...ux-vs.org, wjiang@...ilience.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
> Now the second wording *IS* technically correct, but come on, it's
> 24 words long whereas the original one was 3 -- and hopefully anybody
> reading the shorter phrase *would* have known anyway what was meant,
> without having to be pedantic about it :-)
Well you were talking pretty formal (and detailed) stuff, so
IMHO it's good to have that exactly correct. Sure it's nicer
to use small words most of the time :-)
Segher
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists