[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46C5EDF9.3090507@nortel.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 12:50:33 -0600
From: "Chris Friesen" <cfriesen@...tel.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Nick Piggin <piggin@...erone.com.au>,
Satyam Sharma <satyam@...radead.org>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>,
Chris Snook <csnook@...hat.com>,
Ilpo Jarvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, ak@...e.de,
heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
schwidefsky@...ibm.com, wensong@...ux-vs.org, horms@...ge.net.au,
wjiang@...ilience.com, zlynx@....org, rpjday@...dspring.com,
jesper.juhl@...il.com, segher@...nel.crashing.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all
architectures
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> - in other words, the *only* possible meaning for "volatile" is a purely
> single-CPU meaning. And if you only have a single CPU involved in the
> process, the "volatile" is by definition pointless (because even
> without a volatile, the compiler is required to make the C code appear
> consistent as far as a single CPU is concerned).
I assume you mean "except for IO-related code and 'random' values like
jiffies" as you mention later on? I assume other values set in
interrupt handlers would count as "random" from a volatility perspective?
> So anybody who argues for "volatile" fixing bugs is fundamentally
> incorrect. It does NO SUCH THING. By arguing that, such people only show
> that you have no idea what they are talking about.
What about reading values modified in interrupt handlers, as in your
"random" case? Or is this a bug where the user of atomic_read() is
invalidly expecting a read each time it is called?
Chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists