[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8A71B368A89016469F72CD08050AD334018E20C2@maui.asicdesigners.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 18:45:24 -0700
From: "Felix Marti" <felix@...lsio.com>
To: "Andi Kleen" <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: "David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, <jeff@...zik.org>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <rdreier@...co.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <general@...ts.openfabrics.org>
Subject: RE: [ofa-general] Re: [PATCH RFC] RDMA/CMA: Allocate PS_TCPportsfrom the host TCP port space.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ak@...e.de [mailto:ak@...e.de] On Behalf Of Andi Kleen
> Sent: Sunday, August 19, 2007 4:28 PM
> To: Felix Marti
> Cc: David Miller; jeff@...zik.org; netdev@...r.kernel.org;
> rdreier@...co.com; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> general@...ts.openfabrics.org
> Subject: Re: [ofa-general] Re: [PATCH RFC] RDMA/CMA: Allocate
> PS_TCPportsfrom the host TCP port space.
>
> "Felix Marti" <felix@...lsio.com> writes:
>
> > what benefits does the TSO infrastructure give the
> > non-TSO capable devices?
>
> It improves performance on software queueing devices between guests
> and hypervisors. This is a more and more important application these
> days. Even when the system running the Hypervisor has a non TSO
> capable device in the end it'll still save CPU cycles this way. Right
> now
> virtualized IO tends to much more CPU intensive than direct IO so any
> help it can get is beneficial.
>
> It also makes loopback faster, although given that's probably not that
> useful.
>
> And a lot of the "TSO infrastructure" was needed for zero copy TX
> anyways,
> which benefits most reasonable modern NICs (anything with hardware
> checksumming)
Hi Andi, yes, you're right. I should have chosen my example more
carefully.
>
> -Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists