[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <p73y7g6yt3j.fsf@bingen.suse.de>
Date: 20 Aug 2007 20:10:56 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: "Felix Marti" <felix@...lsio.com>
Cc: "Evgeniy Polyakov" <johnpol@....mipt.ru>, jeff@...zik.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, rdreier@...co.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, general@...ts.openfabrics.org,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [ofa-general] Re: [PATCH RFC] RDMA/CMA: Allocate PS_TCPportsfrom the host TCP port space.
"Felix Marti" <felix@...lsio.com> writes:
> What I was referring to is that TSO(/LRO) have their own
> issues, some eluded to by Roland and me. In fact, customers working on
> the LSR couldn't use TSO due to the burstiness it introduces
That was in old kernels where TSO didn't honor the initial cwnd correctly,
right? I assume it's long fixed.
If not please clarify what the problem was.
> have a look at graphics.
> Graphics used to be done by the host CPU and now we have dedicated
> graphics adapters that do a much better job...
Is your off load device as programable as a modern GPU?
> farfetched that offload devices can do a better job at a data-flow
> problem?
One big difference is that there is no potentially adverse and
always varying internet between the graphics card and your monitor.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists