lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1187699422.5324.41.camel@localhost> Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 08:30:22 -0400 From: jamal <hadi@...erus.ca> To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> Cc: krkumar2@...ibm.com, gaagaan@...il.com, general@...ts.openfabrics.org, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, jagana@...ibm.com, jeff@...zik.org, johnpol@....mipt.ru, kaber@...sh.net, kumarkr@...ux.ibm.com, mcarlson@...adcom.com, mchan@...adcom.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com, rdreier@...co.com, rick.jones2@...com, Robert.Olsson@...a.slu.se, shemminger@...ux-foundation.org, sri@...ibm.com, tgraf@...g.ch, xma@...ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9 Rev3] Implement batching skb API and support in IPoIB On Tue, 2007-21-08 at 00:18 -0700, David Miller wrote: > Using 16K buffer size really isn't going to keep the pipe full enough > for TSO. Why the comparison with TSO (or GSO for that matter)? Seems to me that is only valid/fair if you have a single flow. Batching is multi-flow focused (or i should say flow-unaware). cheers, jamal - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists