lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <200708220026.l7M0QODr013175@toshiba.co.jp> Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 09:26:24 +0900 (JST) From: Ishizaki Kou <kou.ishizaki@...hiba.co.jp> To: linas@...tin.ibm.com Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, cbe-oss-dev@...abs.org, arnd@...db.de Subject: Re: [Cbe-oss-dev] [PATCH] spidernet: fix interrupt reason recognition Linas Vepstas wrote: > On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 10:13:27PM +0900, Ishizaki Kou wrote: > > Please apply this to 2.6.23. > > I'll review and forward shortly. Kick me if you don't see a formal > reply in a few days. > > > And also, please apply the following Arnd-san's patch to fix a problem > > that spidernet driver sometimes causes a BUG_ON at open. > > > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cbe-oss-dev/patch?id=12211 > > Are you sure? This patch no longer applies cleanly, in part because I see. I'll send another applicable patch. > your patch "[PATCH] spidernet: improve interrupt handling" > from Mon, 09 Jul 2007 added a spider_net_enable_interrupts(card); > at the end of spider_net_open(). Because of this, it seems like > Arnd's patch is no longer needed, right? As you pointed out, we intended that "[PATCH] spidernet: improve interrupt handling" solves the same problem which Arnd's patch solves. When spider_net_open() is called, interrupt reasons sometimes remain on interrupt status register, even though they are masked by mask register. With this patch, spider_net_interrupt() compares the value of interrupt status register with SPIDER_NET_INTX_MASK_VALUE, not with interrupt mask register value. As a result, spider_net_interrupt() (which is called from request_irq() in spider_net_open()) starts polling and causes BUG_ON(). So, netif_poll_enable() must be called before request_irq() is called. This is the reason that we also need Arnd's patch. Best regards, Kou Ishizaki - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists