netdev - Re: eHEA driver issues from net-2.6.24

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 23 Aug 2007 08:55:29 +0200
From:	Jan-Bernd Themann <ossthema@...ibm.com>
To:	Andrew Theurer <habanero@...ibm.com>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: eHEA driver issues from net-2.6.24

On Thursday 23 August 2007 00:20, Andrew Theurer wrote:
> David Miller wrote:
> > From: Andrew Theurer <habanero@...ibm.com>
> > Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 16:55:03 -0500
> >
> > Thanks for finally getting to test this, I thought nobody
> > would test this until it got merged into 2.6.24 :-/
> >

Yes, sorry for the delay. 

> >   
> >> kernel BUG at include/linux/netdevice.h:318!
> >> enter ? for help
> >> [c00000000f613e40] c0000000003fe394 .net_rx_action+0x1b8/0x254
> >> [c00000000f613ef0] c000000000057b70 .__do_softirq+0xa8/0x164
> >> [c00000000f613f90] c000000000024438 .call_do_softirq+0x14/0x24
> >> [c000000b8ffbf9f0] c00000000000bd30 .do_softirq+0x68/0xac
> >> [c000000b8ffbfa80] c000000000057cc4 .irq_exit+0x54/0x6c
> >> [c000000b8ffbfb00] c00000000000c358 .do_IRQ+0x170/0x1ac
> >> [c000000b8ffbfb90] c000000000004780 hardware_interrupt_entry+0x18/0x98
> >> --- Exception: 501 (Hardware Interrupt) at c000000000010bdc 
> >> .cpu_idle+0x114/0x1e0
> >> [c000000b8ffbfe80] c000000000010bd0 .cpu_idle+0x108/0x1e0 (unreliable)
> >> [c000000b8ffbff00] c000000000026db0 .start_secondary+0x160/0x184
> >> [c000000b8ffbff90] c000000000008364 .start_secondary_prolog+0xc/0x10
> >>
> >> I'm a little confused if the port_napi_enable() is being called when the 
> >> device is initialized, but then again, this is all new to me (should it 
> >> be called in ehea_open?).  I see it called on some reset routines, but 
> >> not on the first initialization.
> >>     
> >
> > This is similar to the problem that Arnaldo hit a few minutes
> > ago in the VIA Rhine driver.
> >
> > You can't only make a napi_enable() call when there has been
> > a previous napi_disable().
> >
> > One way to fix this would be to forcefully napi_disable() on
> > all the per-port NAPI structs at the beginning of ehea_open(),
> > which should set things up to satisfy the pre-condition of the
> > napi_enable() calls.
> >   
> OK, Ill try this. 

Let me fix this. I'll try to get it done today.

> > You'll need to audit the entire driver to make sure this invariant
> > is held properly.
> >
> >   
> >> Also, on this code, in ehea_sense_port_attr()
> >>
> >> /* Number of default QPs */
> >>         if (use_mcs)
> >>                 port->num_def_qps = cb0->num_default_qps;
> >>         else
> >>                 port->num_def_qps = 1;
> >>                
> >>
> >> When using napi, since we have multi-queue napi support now, wouldn't we 
> >> want to use all the default qps instead of 1?
> >>     
> >
> > I don't know how this hardware works, you tell me :-)
> >   
> Heh, I don't know it well, either. Maybe Jan Bernd can chime in.

We'd like to keep the possibility to switch back to a single queue for now.
However, we could activate multi queue support as default now.
I'll include this in the patch.

> 
> Thanks for your help,
> 
> -Andrew
> 
> 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html