[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <OFF62B08D8.4B722584-ON65257340.000EF898-65257340.000F1081@in.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 08:14:32 +0530
From: Krishna Kumar2 <krkumar2@...ibm.com>
To: "Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, gaagaan@...il.com,
general@...ts.openfabrics.org, hadi@...erus.ca,
herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, jagana@...ibm.com, jeff@...zik.org,
johnpol@....mipt.ru, kaber@...sh.net, kumarkr@...ux.ibm.com,
mcarlson@...adcom.com, mchan@...adcom.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com, rdreier@...co.com,
rick.jones2@...com, Robert.Olsson@...a.slu.se,
shemminger@...ux-foundation.org, sri@...ibm.com, tgraf@...g.ch,
xma@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10 Rev4] [E1000] Implement batching
Hi Auke,
"Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com> wrote on 08/22/2007 08:09:31 PM:
> Krishna,
>
> while I appreciate the patch I would have preferred a patch to e1000e.
Not only
> does the e1000e driver remove a lot of the workarounds for old silicon,
it is
> also a good way for us to move the current e1000 driver into a bit more
stable
> maintenance mode.
>
> Do you think you can write this patch for e1000e instead? code-wise a lot
of
> things are still the same, so your patch should be relatively easy to
generate.
>
> e1000e currently lives in a branch from jeff garzik's netdev-2.6 tree
Definitely, I will pick it up and generate a patch.
Thanks,
- KK
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists