lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 08:14:32 +0530 From: Krishna Kumar2 <krkumar2@...ibm.com> To: "Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com> Cc: davem@...emloft.net, gaagaan@...il.com, general@...ts.openfabrics.org, hadi@...erus.ca, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, jagana@...ibm.com, jeff@...zik.org, johnpol@....mipt.ru, kaber@...sh.net, kumarkr@...ux.ibm.com, mcarlson@...adcom.com, mchan@...adcom.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com, rdreier@...co.com, rick.jones2@...com, Robert.Olsson@...a.slu.se, shemminger@...ux-foundation.org, sri@...ibm.com, tgraf@...g.ch, xma@...ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10 Rev4] [E1000] Implement batching Hi Auke, "Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com> wrote on 08/22/2007 08:09:31 PM: > Krishna, > > while I appreciate the patch I would have preferred a patch to e1000e. Not only > does the e1000e driver remove a lot of the workarounds for old silicon, it is > also a good way for us to move the current e1000 driver into a bit more stable > maintenance mode. > > Do you think you can write this patch for e1000e instead? code-wise a lot of > things are still the same, so your patch should be relatively easy to generate. > > e1000e currently lives in a branch from jeff garzik's netdev-2.6 tree Definitely, I will pick it up and generate a patch. Thanks, - KK - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists