lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 12:59:32 +0100 From: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com> To: Satyam Sharma <satyam@...radead.org> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>, Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, Chris Snook <csnook@...hat.com>, clameter@....com, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, ak@...e.de, davem@...emloft.net, schwidefsky@...ibm.com, wensong@...ux-vs.org, horms@...ge.net.au, wjiang@...ilience.com, cfriesen@...tel.com, zlynx@....org, rpjday@...dspring.com, jesper.juhl@...il.com, segher@...nel.crashing.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] i386: Fix a couple busy loops in mach_wakecpu.h:wait_for_init_deassert() On Thursday 16 August 2007 01:39, Satyam Sharma wrote: > > static inline void wait_for_init_deassert(atomic_t *deassert) > { > - while (!atomic_read(deassert)); > + while (!atomic_read(deassert)) > + cpu_relax(); > return; > } For less-than-briliant people like me, it's totally non-obvious that cpu_relax() is needed for correctness here, not just to make P4 happy. IOW: "atomic_read" name quite unambiguously means "I will read this variable from main memory". Which is not true and creates potential for confusion and bugs. -- vda - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists