lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0708241005360.20501@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 10:06:29 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com> To: Satyam Sharma <satyam@...radead.org> cc: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>, Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>, Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, Chris Snook <csnook@...hat.com>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, ak@...e.de, davem@...emloft.net, schwidefsky@...ibm.com, wensong@...ux-vs.org, horms@...ge.net.au, wjiang@...ilience.com, cfriesen@...tel.com, zlynx@....org, rpjday@...dspring.com, jesper.juhl@...il.com, segher@...nel.crashing.org, Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au> Subject: Re: [PATCH] i386: Fix a couple busy loops in mach_wakecpu.h:wait_for_init_deassert() On Fri, 24 Aug 2007, Satyam Sharma wrote: > But if people do seem to have a mixed / confused notion of atomicity > and barriers, and if there's consensus, then as I'd said earlier, I > have no issues in going with the consensus (eg. having API variants). > Linus would be more difficult to convince, however, I suspect :-) The confusion may be the result of us having barrier semantics in atomic_read. If we take that out then we may avoid future confusions. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists