[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <OFB48299BB.9D9BCE91-ON87257341.006139E9-88257341.00614EB7@us.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 10:45:17 -0700
From: Shirley Ma <xma@...ibm.com>
To: linas@...tin.ibm.com (Linas Vepstas)
Cc: akepner@....com, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-ppc <linuxppc-dev@...abs.org>, Marcus@...abs.org,
Eder <meder@...ibm.com>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev-owner@...r.kernel.org,
Jan-Bernd Themann <ossthema@...ibm.com>,
Christoph Raisch <raisch@...ibm.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>,
Stefan Roscher <stefan.roscher@...ibm.com>,
Jan-Bernd Themann <themann@...ibm.com>,
Thomas Klein <tklein@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: RFC: issues concerning the next NAPI interface
> Just to be clear, in the previous email I posted on this thread, I
> described a worst-case network ping-pong test case (send a packet, wait
> for reply), and found out that a deffered interrupt scheme just damaged
> the performance of the test case.
When splitting rx and tx handler, I found some performance gain by
deffering interrupt scheme in tx not rx in IPoIB driver.
Shirley
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists