lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 27 Aug 2007 13:41:31 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	johannes@...solutions.net
Cc:	joe@...ches.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-2.6.24] introduce MAC_FMT/MAC_ARG

From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 12:54:09 +0200

> -- change macros to --
> #define MAC_FMT "%s"
> #define MAC_ARG(a) ({char __buf[18]; print_mac(a, buf); __buf})
> 
> I'm not sure we'd want that, but at the time you said it made the kernel
> significantly smaller and I doubt there's a performance problem with it
> (who prints mac addresses regularly?)

I don't think this works.

The scope of the __buf[18] array is inside of that MAC_ARG()
expression, which will be fully evaluated before constructing
the argument to printk().

Therefore printk() will be passed what is essentially a stale stack
pointer.

You'd need something like a "MAC_BUF buf;" all the callers need
to declare, and a new "buf" argument to MAC_ARG().

If this was the goal, there are better approches to this, how
about just calling:

	print_mac(dev->dev_addr);

Sure, we'll have to split up printk() calls, but in the end it's
likely still smaller and better.  And I think it's much cleaner
than this macro stuff.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists