[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1188319550.6062.31.camel@localhost>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 09:45:50 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Paul Moore <paul.moore@...com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [NET]: Mark Paul Moore as maintainer of labelled networking.
On Tue, 2007-08-28 at 08:46 -0400, Paul Moore wrote:
> If having both a labeled networking and NetLabel maintainer entry is a
> problem then how about the patch below?
I don't think it is.
> -NETWORKING [LABELED] (NetLabel, CIPSO, Labeled IPsec, SECMARK)
> +NETWORKING [LABELED] (NetLabel/CIPSO, Labeled IPsec, SECMARK)
> P: Paul Moore
> M: paul.moore@...com
> +W: http://netlabel.sf.net (NetLabel/CIPSO)
> L: netdev@...r.kernel.org
> S: Maintained
My preference would be for something like:
NETLABEL and CIPSO
P: Paul Moore
M: paul.moore@...com
W: http://netlabel.sf.net
L: netdev@...r.kernel.org
S: Maintained
F: Documentation/netlabel/
F: include/net/netlabel.h
F: net/netlabel/
Labeled IPsec and SECMARK
P: Paul Moore
M: paul.moore@...com
L: netdev@...r.kernel.org
S: Supported
F: include/linux/netfilter/*SECMARK*
F: net/netfilter/*SECMARK*
I would like to add appropriate file patterns for each
block. Also, I'm not sure of the Supported/Maintained
status of each block.
The distinction is supposed to be:
Supported: Someone is actually paid to look after this.
Maintained: Someone actually looks after it.
Could you please clarify those for me?
cheers, Joe
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists