[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5640c7e00708291533s30868cc8t69b989f0e53b9569@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 10:33:32 +1200
From: "Ian McDonald" <ian.mcdonald@...di.co.nz>
To: "David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: rick.jones2@...com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] make _minimum_ TCP retransmission timeout configurable
On 8/30/07, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> In fact this is a great example why we don't treat RFCs as dictations
> from the gods. They are often wrong, impractical, or full of fatal
> flaws.
>
Correct - they often have flaws in them, just like all documents. If
that is the case we should try and get the RFCs fixed. I've raised
this in a discussion in the ICCRG group and see if I get any sort of
response.
Ian
--
Web1: http://wand.net.nz/~iam4/
Web2: http://www.jandi.co.nz
Blog: http://iansblog.jandi.co.nz
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists