[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070829.155911.08334782.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 15:59:11 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: jheffner@....edu
Cc: shemminger@...ux-foundation.org, ian.mcdonald@...di.co.nz,
rick.jones2@...com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: NCR, was [PATCH] make _minimum_ TCP retransmission timeout
configurable
From: John Heffner <jheffner@....edu>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 18:58:12 -0400
> I don't believe this was the case. NCR is substantially different, and
> came out of work at Texas A&M. The original (only) implementation was
> in Linux IIRC. Its goal was to do better. Their papers say it does.
> It might be worth looking at.
>
> In my own experience with reordering, Alexey's code had some
> hard-to-track-down bugs (look at all the work Ilpo's been doing), and
> the relative simplicity of NCR may be one of the reasons it does well in
> tests.
Interesting, thanks for the info John.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists