[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070829122841.5166e94e.varunc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 12:28:41 +0530
From: Varun Chandramohan <varunc@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: davem@...emloft.net
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, kaber@...sh.net, socketcan@...tkopp.net,
shemminger@...ux-foundation.org, krkumar2@...ibm.com,
tgraf@...g.ch, varuncha@...ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH 0/4 Rev-3] Age Entry For IPv4 & IPv6 Route Table
Hi Dave,
The is the next revision of the age patch. This contains changes as suggested in the last rev.
Can you review and push it in? I also added the changelog below.
Original Comment:
According to the RFC 4292 (IP Forwarding Table MIB) there is a need for an age entry for all the routes in therouting table. The entry in the RFC is inetCidrRouteAge and oid is inetCidrRouteAge.1.10.
Many snmp application require this age entry. So iam adding the age field in the routing table for ipv4 and ipv6 and providing the interface for this value netlink.
I made a note of changes i made as per the suggestions given in the community. Here is the changelog.
Changelog since ver 1:
---------------------
Changes Suggestion
1)Change in the interface from proc to netlink.
It was not approved by David Miller and Yoshifuji. David Miller & Yoshifuji
2)Change from jiffies to timeval. Eric Dumazet
3)Rounding up timeval Patrick McHardy, Oliver Hartkopp
Eric Dumazet.
4)Relocate timeval_to_sec Stephen Hemminger, Krishna Kumar
5)Using macro RT6_GET_ROUTE_INFO Krishna Kumar
6)Add proper comment for timeval_to_sec Eric Dumazet
7)Add proper comment for timeval insertion Thomas Graf
Signed-off-by: Varun Chandramohan <varunc@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists