[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070829.212613.65744831.noboru.obata.ar@hitachi.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 21:26:13 +0900 (JST)
From: OBATA Noboru <noboru.obata.ar@...achi.com>
To: davem@...emloft.net
Cc: shemminger@...ux-foundation.org, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.22] TCP: Make TCP_RTO_MAX a variable (take 2)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.22] TCP: Make TCP_RTO_MAX a variable (take 2)
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 13:30:57 -0700 (PDT)
> From: OBATA Noboru <noboru.obata.ar@...achi.com>
> Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 22:04:47 +0900 (JST)
>
> > (1) Make the application timeouts longer. (Steve has shown that
> > making an application timeouts twice the failover detection
> > timeout would be a solution.)
>
> This is the only feasible solution to your problem.
What about another option to let TCP have a notification?
Can it be a solution if it is standardized?
--
OBATA Noboru (noboru.obata.ar@...achi.com)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists