lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 31 Aug 2007 17:11:31 +0800
From:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To:	James Chapman <jchapman@...alix.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Michal Ostrowski <mostrows@...akeasy.net>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
	Toralf F?rster <toralf.foerster@....de>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/7] [PPP] pppoe: Fix data clobbering in __pppoe_xmit and return value

[PPP] pppoe: Fix data clobbering in __pppoe_xmit and return value

The function __pppoe_xmit modifies the skb data and therefore it needs
to copy and skb data if it's cloned.

In fact, it currently allocates a new skb so that it can return 0 in
case of error without freeing the original skb.  This is totally wrong
because returning zero is meant to indicate congestion whereupon pppoe
is supposed to wake up the upper layer once the congestion subsides.

This makes sense for ppp_async and ppp_sync but is out-of-place for
pppoe.  This patch makes it always return 1 and free the skb.

Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
---

 drivers/net/pppoe.c |   50 +++++++++++++-------------------------------------
 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/pppoe.c b/drivers/net/pppoe.c
index 5ac3eff..8818253 100644
--- a/drivers/net/pppoe.c
+++ b/drivers/net/pppoe.c
@@ -850,9 +850,7 @@ static int __pppoe_xmit(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
 	struct net_device *dev = po->pppoe_dev;
 	struct pppoe_hdr hdr;
 	struct pppoe_hdr *ph;
-	int headroom = skb_headroom(skb);
 	int data_len = skb->len;
-	struct sk_buff *skb2;
 
 	if (sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD) || !(sk->sk_state & PPPOX_CONNECTED))
 		goto abort;
@@ -866,53 +864,31 @@ static int __pppoe_xmit(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
 	if (!dev)
 		goto abort;
 
-	/* Copy the skb if there is no space for the header. */
-	if (headroom < (sizeof(struct pppoe_hdr) + dev->hard_header_len)) {
-		skb2 = dev_alloc_skb(32+skb->len +
-				     sizeof(struct pppoe_hdr) +
-				     dev->hard_header_len);
-
-		if (skb2 == NULL)
-			goto abort;
-
-		skb_reserve(skb2, dev->hard_header_len + sizeof(struct pppoe_hdr));
-		skb_copy_from_linear_data(skb, skb_put(skb2, skb->len),
-					  skb->len);
-	} else {
-		/* Make a clone so as to not disturb the original skb,
-		 * give dev_queue_xmit something it can free.
-		 */
-		skb2 = skb_clone(skb, GFP_ATOMIC);
-
-		if (skb2 == NULL)
-			goto abort;
-	}
+	/* Copy the data if there is no space for the header or if it's
+	 * read-only.
+	 */
+	if (skb_cow(skb, sizeof(*ph) + dev->hard_header_len))
+		goto abort;
 
-	ph = (struct pppoe_hdr *) skb_push(skb2, sizeof(struct pppoe_hdr));
+	ph = (struct pppoe_hdr *) skb_push(skb, sizeof(struct pppoe_hdr));
 	memcpy(ph, &hdr, sizeof(struct pppoe_hdr));
-	skb2->protocol = __constant_htons(ETH_P_PPP_SES);
+	skb->protocol = __constant_htons(ETH_P_PPP_SES);
 
-	skb_reset_network_header(skb2);
+	skb_reset_network_header(skb);
 
-	skb2->dev = dev;
+	skb->dev = dev;
 
-	dev->hard_header(skb2, dev, ETH_P_PPP_SES,
+	dev->hard_header(skb, dev, ETH_P_PPP_SES,
 			 po->pppoe_pa.remote, NULL, data_len);
 
-	/* We're transmitting skb2, and assuming that dev_queue_xmit
-	 * will free it.  The generic ppp layer however, is expecting
-	 * that we give back 'skb' (not 'skb2') in case of failure,
-	 * but free it in case of success.
-	 */
-
-	if (dev_queue_xmit(skb2) < 0)
+	if (dev_queue_xmit(skb) < 0)
 		goto abort;
 
-	kfree_skb(skb);
 	return 1;
 
 abort:
-	return 0;
+	kfree_skb(skb);
+	return 1;
 }
 
 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists