lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 08:26:20 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net> To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> Cc: dlezcano@...ibm.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, ralf@...ux-mips.org Subject: Re: [patch 0/1][RFC] add a private field to the sock structure Em Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 10:40:49PM -0700, David Miller escreveu: > From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net> > Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 16:18:31 -0300 > > > Nah, it still there, sk_protinfo, its just ax25 that uses it > > (nudge(Ralf)). How do we state that a struct field is deprecated and > > will be removed soon(tm)? > > You get rid of all the in-tree users and then just kill it :) > > More seriously, I don't think we need a deprecation schedule > for a struct member, either it's not used in-tree anymore or > it isn't. We'll go crazy with any other policy and it's > difficult enough shrinking these things :-) OK, I think its enough to say to dlezcano that he should avoid using sk_protinfo, as soon as we do the work on AX.25 sk_protinfo will be removed. - Arnaldo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists