lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 31 Aug 2007 07:58:51 -0400
From:	Dan Williams <>
To:	"John W. Linville" <>
Cc:	Nick Kossifidis <>,
	Christoph Hellwig <>,
	Jiri Slaby <>,,,
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] Net: ath5k, kconfig changes

On Thu, 2007-08-30 at 08:36 -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 04:38:09AM +0300, Nick Kossifidis wrote:
> > 2007/8/28, Christoph Hellwig <>:
> > > Also this whole patch seems rather pointless.  It saves only
> > > very little and turns the driver into a complete ifdef maze.
> > Also most
> > people will use 5212 code only, 5211 cards are on some old laptops and
> > 5210, well i couldn't even find  a 5210 for actual testing :P
> FWIW, I'd bet dollars to donuts that distros will enable them all
> together.

I would certainly _hope_ that distros enable everything -that is in the
kernel- that they can get their hands on, otherwise when you stick a
card in, it doesn't just work.


> Is saving code space the only reason to turn these off?  How much
> space do you save?
> Is there some way you can isolate and/or limit the number of ifdef
> blocks further?  If so, we might consider a version of this patch
> that depends on EMBEDDED or somesuch...?
> John

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists