[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46D811BB.5060007@garzik.org>
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 09:03:55 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: ram.vepa@...erion.com
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, support@...erion.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.24 4/5]S2io: Check for CARD_DOWN before handling traffic
Ramkrishna Vepa wrote:
> - Added check to return from the traffic handling function, if the card status
> is DOWN.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sivakumar Subramani <sivakumar.subramani@...erion.com>
> Signed-off-by: Santosh Rastapur <santosh.rastapur@...erion.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ramkrishna Vepa <ram.vepa@...erion.com>
> ---
> diff -Nurp patch3/drivers/net/s2io.c patch4/drivers/net/s2io.c
> --- patch3/drivers/net/s2io.c 2007-08-15 08:57:32.000000000 -0700
> +++ patch4/drivers/net/s2io.c 2007-08-15 08:42:14.000000000 -0700
> @@ -2927,6 +2927,11 @@ static int s2io_poll(struct net_device *
> int i;
>
> atomic_inc(&nic->isr_cnt);
> + if (unlikely(atomic_read(&nic->card_state) == CARD_DOWN)) {
> + atomic_dec(&nic->isr_cnt);
> + return IRQ_NONE;
> + }
> +
> mac_control = &nic->mac_control;
> config = &nic->config;
>
invalid return value, for this function
Overall, this looks quite racy -- why does the card state differ from
net_device state in the first place?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists